Future World Electronics LLC v. Over Drive Marketing LLC et al
| Future World Electronics LLC |
| Over Drive Marketing LLC, Bart Schnell, JS Direct Marketing LLC and The Auto Park Inc |
| 3:2012cv02124 |
| July 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Rule 37(a) Motion to Hold Bart Schnell in Contempt and to Compel Post-Judgment Discovery Responses from Over Drive Marketing, LLC and Bart Schnell. Local Civil Rules 7.1(a) and (h ) require that parties confer before filing an application for attorneys' fees. Plaintiff's counsel and Mr. Schnell are directed to meet face-to-face and confer about the reasonable amount of any requested fees. This face-to-face requiremen t is not satisfied by a telephonic conference. No later than 5/19/2014, the parties must file a joint status report notifying the Court of the results of the conference. Plaintiff is ORDERED to cause a copy of this order to be personally served on Bart Schnell and to then file an affidavit of service. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 5/5/2014) (ctf)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 48 Motion for Default Judgment. Because Over Drive has failed to comply with the Court's Order to obtain counsel, the Court STRIKES Over Drive's Answer (doc. 15 ). In a ddition, the Court finds that default judgment is appropriate against Over Drive and that Future World is entitled to statutory damages. However, the Court DENIES Future World's request for $82,500 and ORDERS the parties to appear at a hear ing - the date and time to be specified by separate order - so that it may determine the proper amount to award. Once statutory damages have been determined, the Court will rule on Future World's request for pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, and costs and attorneys' fees. Finally, the Court GRANTS Future World's request for injunctive relief. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 11/5/2013) (ctf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
