Christoph v. Young et al
Plaintiff: Raymond Christoph
Defendant: C Young, R Winfield, Linda Richey and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Case Number: 3:2012cv02152
Filed: July 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Jeff Kaplan
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER Accepting 40 Findings and Recommendations on Case. Accordingly, the court sua sponte dismisses the petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and comply with orders of the court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 4/28/2016) (ran)
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Order Accepting 30 Findings and Recommendations: After considering the pleadings, file, record in this case, and Report, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which r elief may be granted. The court will allow Plaintiff's First Amendment freedom of expression claim against Sergeant C. Young to proceed and directs the United States Marshal to effect service on Sergeant C. Young in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) by serving a copy of a summons, Plaintiff's Complaint, and this order. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/7/2014) (cea)
November 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Memorandum Opinion and Order Accepting 11 Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 11/2/2012) (axm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christoph v. Young et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Christoph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R Winfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Richey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?