Nieman v. Hale et al
| Jason Lee Nieman |
| Keith Hale, Insurance Search Group and John Doe Corporation |
| 3:2012cv02433 |
| July 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
195
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: After considering the motions, the court denies Defendant Hale's Motion to Alter or Amend the Court's Judgment Granting Plaintiff Nieman Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (Dkt. No. 191 ) in Accord with Rule 59(e) (Doc. 192 ); and denies as moot Defendant Hale's Request to Submit Corrections to Dkt. No. 192 (Doc. 193 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/5/2015) (bdb)
|
|
Filing
191
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2) (Doc. 190 ), filed 6/17/2015. For the reasons herein explained, the court grants Plaintiffs Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2) (Doc. 190 ) and dismisses without prejudice this action under Rule 41(a)(2). The alternative relief requested by Plaintiff is denied. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/18/2015) (ctf)
|
|
Filing
185
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court vacates the order of reference in this case (Doc. 19 ), accepts the magistrate judge's findings and conclusions (Doc. 179 ) as to the parties' summary judgment motions, and concludes that the magist rate judge's denial of Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Sanctions against Defendants is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, the court denies Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 164 ); denies Defendants 9; Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 166 ), overrules the parties' objections to the Report; and overrules Plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's order denying his Motion for Discovery Sanctions against Defendants. Further, the court concludes that Plaintiff has abandoned his claims against John Doe Corporation and dismisses without prejudice all claims by Plaintiff against John Doe Corporation for alleged employment law violations under Title VII, the TCHRA, and the IH RA, whether based on direct or vicarious liability theories. The court also moves sua sponte to dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff's IHRA claim. Plaintiff shall file a response to the court's sua sponte motion by 6/17/2015. Additionally, the court orders ISG to retain counsel by 6/17/2015. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/3/2015) (ctf)
|
|
Filing
143
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 139 Supplemental MOTION for Sanctions as to the Failed Deposition of Keith Hale of March 24, 2014,. Defendant Keith Hale shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause by 9/12/2014. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 9/4/2014) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing
134
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Hale's Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 111 ) is DENIED, and Nieman's Motion for Enlargement of Time (Dkt. No. 129 ) is GRANTED. The Court ORDERS that the parties may now, by 9/26/2014, file any motio n related to discovery in this case or any other motion not otherwise covered by the Court's Initial Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 34 ). The Court will reset the deadline for any dispositive motion in a future order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 8/6/2014) (cea)
|
|
Filing
120
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 86 MOTION for Discovery Sanctions. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 4/21/2014) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing
65
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part 44 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 52 Motion for Protective Order. Discovery due by 2/26/2014. Dispositive Motions due by 3/31/2014. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 12/26/2013) (twd)
|
|
Filing
30
Order Accepting 29 Findings and Recommendations on Motions. The court grants Defendant's 17 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and dismisses Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Further, the court will permit Plain tiff to amend his pleadings. Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Leave to File His Second Amended is granted. Plaintiff shall file his second amended complaint by 8/6/2013. No further amendments of Plaintiff's pleadings will be permitted. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/23/2013) (tln)
|
|
Filing
7
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 5 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and denying 5 Motion for Issuance of a Summons and Service by Way of the Clerk of the Court and U.S. Marshall's[sic] Service. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended complaint by by 8/22/2012. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/8/2012) (ctf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
