Smith et al v. Sanders et al
Lawrence M Smith and United States of America |
Deion L Sanders, Damien Lamarc Wallace, Frederick R Mays, Chazma Jones, Carl Gerald Dorvil, Uplift Fort Worth CDC, Prime Time Association, Remond Elder, Jennifer Young, Reginald Calhoun, Jane Doe and John Doe |
RonKesha Evett Mays, Herman Murray, T. Christopher Lewis and Full Gospel Holy Temple |
3:2012cv04377 |
October 31, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Barbara M.G. Lynn |
Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
False Claims Act |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 520 ORDER ACCEPTING 519 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiffs' 517 Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant, Uplift FortWorth, CDC is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 6/15/2020) (twd) |
Filing 461 Order Accepting 447 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Pleadings, Enter Default, and Enter Default Judgment Against Defendant, Prime Time Association, filed 11/5/2018 (doc. 432 ), is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/11/2019) (zkc) |
Filing 446 ORDER re: the defendant's 439 Motion for Reconsideration of Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation re: Plaintiff's Second Amended Motion for Sanctions and Contempt of Court Against Pro Se Defendant, Deion L. Sanders. After considera tion of the relevant filings, applicable law, and oral argument, the motion is GRANTED. The Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation, filed 3/5/2019 (doc. 437 ), are hereby VACATED, and Plaintiffs' Second Amended Motion for Sanctions and Conte mpt of Court Against Pro Se Defendant, Deion L. Sanders, filed 6/11/2018 (doc. 425 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Counsel are hereby directed to meet face-to-face and confer about whether fees should be awarded and the reasonableness of any requested fees. By 4/2/2019, the parties must notify the Court of the results of the conference in writing. Defendant may file a response by 4/9/2019. Relator may file a reply by 4/16/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 3/18/2019) (mcrd) |
Filing 419 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. 392 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Chazma Jones, Frederick R Mays, Damien Lamarc Wallace is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 5/10/2018) (svc) |
Filing 405 Order Accepting 319 Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant Charity Churchs Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Brief in Support, filed 4/4/2017 (doc. 243 ) is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 12/21/2017) (ams) |
Filing 390 ORDER ACCEPTING 387 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Motion for Summary Judgment Filed By Defendants Damien LaMarc Wallace, Fredrick R. Mays and Chazma Jones, filed 7/30/2017 (doc. 333 ) is GRANTED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 10/10/2017) (axm) |
Filing 330 Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 301 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 2 Complaint, filed by Lawrence M Smith. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/27/2017) (ndt) |
Filing 257 ORDER Accepting 245 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on 235 Motion for Default Judgment. The 235 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/26/2017) (ran) |
Filing 233 ORDER Accepting 212 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on 184 Motion to Dismiss and 186 Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/21/2017) (ran) |
Filing 214 ORDER ACCEPTING 204 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Plaintiff's 159 Motion for Default Judgment is denied and the Defendant's 178 Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default is granted. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/31/2017) (epm) |
Filing 197 ORDER Accepting 190 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. Plaintiffs' Motions for Default Judgment, filed 7/5/2016 (docs. 161 , 162 , 163 and 164 ) are DENIED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/1/2016) (ran) |
Filing 166 ORDER ACCEPTING 151 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 149 Motion for Default Judgment. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/11/2016) (ykp) |
Filing 150 ORDER ACCEPTING 142 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: 116 Motion for Default Judgment, 111 Motion for Default Judgment are DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/25/2016) (ykp) |
Filing 144 ORDER ACCEPTING 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Defendant Carl Gerald Dorvil's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, filed March 5, 2015 (doc. 94 ), is GRANTED. By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff's claims against Carl Gerald Dorvil will be DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 1/11/2016) (aaa) |
Filing 134 ORDER ACCEPTING 132 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant Charity Church's Second Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, filed January 6, 2015 (doc. 84 ), is GRANTED. By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff's claims against Charity Church will be DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/30/2015) (tln) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.