Taylor v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Northern District Taylor v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID

Taylor v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID

Petitioner:	Rory Darnell Taylor
Respondent:	Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number:	3:2012cv04491
Filed:	November 7, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Sidney A Fitzwater
Presiding Judge:	Paul D Stickney
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 27, 2013	Filing 13 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability. The court adopts and incorporates by reference the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation filed in this case in support of its findi ng that the petitioner has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find this court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong," or that reasonable jurists would find "it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right" and "debatable whether [this court] was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.473, 484(2000). If petitioner files a notice of appeal, petitioner must pay the $455.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/27/2013) (ndt)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 27, 2013

Filing 13 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability. The court adopts and incorporates by reference the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation filed in this case in support of its findi ng that the petitioner has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find this court's "assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong," or that reasonable jurists would find "it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right" and "debatable whether [this court] was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.473, 484(2000). If petitioner files a notice of appeal, petitioner must pay the $455.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/27/2013) (ndt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rory Darnell Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?