Shane Galitski et al v. Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
| Shane Galitski, Richard Taliaferro and Brian Newbold |
| Samsung Telecommunications America LLC |
| 3:2012cv04782 |
| November 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
199
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (unsealed and redacted version of 195 ). (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 9/11/2015) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 98 Motion to Dismiss filed by Samsung Telecommunications America LLC, and granting 103 Motion to Compel filed by Samsung Telecommunications America LLC. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/22/2014) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 51 Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Samsung Telecommunications America LLC; granting in part, denying in part 54 Motion to Dismiss filed by Samsung Telecommunications America LLC; and granting 84 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Appendix in Support of Its Motion to Compel Arbitration. (Ordered by Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 12/5/2013) (Chief Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
