Walker Digital, LLC v. Google, Inc. et al
| Walker Digital LLC |
| Google Inc, Microsoft Corp and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC |
| 3:2012mc00092 |
| September 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Notice of Filing of Official Electronic Transcript of Motion to Compel Proceedings held on 11/02/2012 before Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. Court Reporter/Transcriber Kathy Rehling, kathyrehlingtranscripts@gmail.com, Telephone number 940-498-2402. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript. A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Redaction Request - Transcript must be filed within 21 days. If no such Request is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. If redaction request filed, this transcript will not be accessible via PACER; see redacted transcript. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed. (32 pages). Redaction Request due 11/26/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/6/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/4/2013. (Rehling, Kathy) |
Filing 20
ORDER: After consideration of the relevant filings, evidence, oral argument, and applicable law, and for the reasons expressly recited into the record during the hearing, the respondent's motion to remit this matter to the District of Delaware is GRANTED, and the motion to compel is hereby remitted to that district for determination in connection with the pending motion for protective order in the underlying litigation, No. 11-309-SLR. This matter shall be administratively closed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 11/2/2012) (mcrd)
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (mcrd) |
| ELECTRONIC Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez: Hearing held on 11/2/2012 re: 1 Microsoft Corporation's Motion to Compel IP Navigation Group's Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Harold Loftin, Jr.; Defense - Robert Earle; Interested Party - Donald Puckett, Amy LaValle. (Court Reporter: Digital File) Time in Court - :44. (mcrd) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER: A Motion hearing has been scheduled for 11/2/2012 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez re: 1 Miscellaneous Case Initiating Documents (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/29/2012) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 18 (Document Restricted) Sealed Appendix in Support re: 17 Sealed and/or Ex Parte Document (Sealed pursuant to order dated 10/27/2012) filed by IP Navigation Group, LLC, Microsoft Corp (Earle, Robert) |
| Filing 17 (Document Restricted) SEALED Joint Submission (Sealed pursuant to order dated 10/27/2012) filed by IP Navigation Group, LLC, Microsoft Corp (Earle, Robert) |
|
Filing 16
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting 15 joint Motion for Leave to File joint submission under seal. The attachments to the motion shall be SEALED. The parties may formally file their joint submission electronically under seal no later than 5:00 p.m. on 10/29/2012. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/27/2012) (Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez)
|
| Filing 15 (Document Restricted) Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Motion and Appendix Under Seal filed by IP Navigation Group, LLC, Microsoft Corp (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s), # 2 Exhibit(s), # 3 Proposed Order) (Earle, Robert) Modified security level on 10/29/2012, attorney intended to file motion under seal (axm). |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: A hearing scheduled for 10/17/2012, at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 1566 is CANCELLED. On 9/27/2012, the parties filed a joint submission that reflected a conference of only ten minutes. The parties are ordered to fully comply with the 9/17/2012 order no later than 10/26/2012, by conducting a meaningful conference and attempt to resolve all outstanding issues, including any new issues, and by filing a joint submission that does not simply incorporate the original motion. No hearing will be scheduled until after the amended joint submission has been filed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/16/2012) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER re: 1 Microsoft Corporation's Motion to Compel IP Navigation Group's Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. A hearing has been scheduled for 10/17/2012 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 10/9/2012) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Correspondence filed by Microsoft Corp (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) Correspondence to Judge Ramirez) (Earle, Robert) |
| Filing 11 Appendix in Support filed by IP Navigation Group, LLC, Microsoft Corp re 10 Response/Objection (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) A, # 2 Exhibit(s) B, # 3 Exhibit(s) C) (Puckett, G) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by IP Navigation Group, LLC, Microsoft Corp re: 1 Miscellaneous Case Initiating Documents (Earle, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Amy E LaValle on behalf of IP Navigation Group, LLC. (LaValle, Amy) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by G Donald Puckett on behalf of IP Navigation Group, LLC. Party IP Navigation Group, LLC added. (Puckett, G) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Microsoft Corp re 6 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing,, (Earle, Robert) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: 1 Microsoft Corporation's Motion to Compel IP Navigation Group's Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. The parties to the dispute are hereby ORDERED to meet face-to-face to fully confer on each of the tems in dispute. Movant shall serve Respondent with a copy of this order and shall file a certificate of service attesting to service no later than 5:00 p.m. on 9/20/2012. Agreed proposed order or joint submission due by 9/27/2012. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 9/17/2012) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 9/14/2012) (skt)
|
| Filing 4 (Document Restricted) Sealed Brief/Memorandum in Support re: 2 Sealed and/or Ex Parte Motion, (Sealed pursuant to order dated 9/13/2012) filed by Microsoft Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s), # 2 Exhibit(s), # 3 Exhibit(s), # 4 Exhibit(s), # 5 Exhibit(s), # 6 Exhibit(s), # 7 Exhibit(s), # 8 Exhibit(s), # 9 Exhibit(s), # 10 Exhibit(s), # 11 Exhibit(s), # 12 Exhibit(s)) (Earle, Robert) |
|
Filing 3
(Document Restricted) Sealed ORDER granting sealed and/or ex parte motion 2 . (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 9/12/2012) (skt)
|
| New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (skt) |
| Filing 2 (Document Restricted) Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (Sealed pursuant to motion to seal) filed by Microsoft Corp. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s), # 2 Exhibit(s), # 3 Exhibit(s), # 4 Exhibit(s), # 5 Exhibit(s), # 6 Exhibit(s), # 7 Exhibit(s), # 8 Exhibit(s), # 9 Exhibit(s), # 10 Exhibit(s), # 11 Exhibit(s), # 12 Exhibit(s), # 13 Exhibit(s), # 14 Proposed Order) (Earle, Robert) |
| Filing 1 Motion to Compel (compliance with a subpoena) filed by Microsoft Corp.. (Filing fee $46; Receipt number 0539-4819686) (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Earle, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
