Bank of New York Mellon v. Coleman

Plaintiff: Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant: Audrey Coleman
Case Number: 3:2013cv00903
Filed: February 27, 2013
Court: Texas Northern District Court
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M.G. Lynn
Referring Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity: Forcible Detainer
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 10, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ACCEPTING 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Accordingly, this action will be sua sponte REMANDED to the Dallas County Court at Law No. 4 by separate judgment. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/10/2013) (ctf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bank of New York Mellon v. Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bank of New York Mellon
Represented By: Gabriel Ozel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Audrey Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?