Simmons v. Tarrant County 9-1-1 District et al
| Alisa Simmons |
| Tarrant County 9-1-1 District and Gregory Petry |
| 3:2013cv01389 |
| April 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Barbara M.G. Lynn |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' 22 Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED, and Defendants' 37 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's Title VII claim again st Petrey, and her claims under section 1981, the United States Constitution, and the Constitution of the State of Texas are DISMISSED with prejudice. Summary judgment is granted on all claims asserted, or that could have been asserted, in Plaintiffs 2010 Charge, but she may pursue her claims for other matters in the 2012 Charge, including claims for inequitable compensation post-dating the 2010 Charge. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/22/2014) (axm)
|
|
Filing
46
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part, denying in part 42 MOTION for Attorney Fees Defendants' Application for Attorneys' Fees. (See order for specifics) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 6/10/2014) (mcrd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
