Rodgers v. Lancaster Police & Fire Department et al
| Chaz Z 469-Rodgers |
| Lancaster Police & Fire Department, Methodist Dallas Hospital, James Skach, Brian Dorsey, M Adams, Jeremy Stuckey, Daniel Bufe, David P Bryant, Abi M Finberg-Province, Michael Adams, James Grimes, Bryan Dorsey and Devon O Candler |
| 3:2013cv02031 |
| May 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Barbara MG Lynn |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 79 JUDGMENT/MANDATE of USCA as to #73 Notice of Appeal filed by Chaz Z 469-Rodgers. It is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Issued as Mandate: 3/16/2018. (svc) |
| Filing 78 Opinion of USCA in accordance with USCA judgment re #73 Notice of Appeal filed by Chaz Z 469-Rodgers. (svc) |
Filing 77
ORDER ACCEPTING #76 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: #71 Party's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Relief from the Judgment, #72 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/21/2017) (aaa)
|
|
Filing 76
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: #71 Party's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Relief from the Judgment; and #72 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment. Plaintiff's Rule 60(a) and Rule 60(b) motions should be DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/24/2017) (mcrd)
|
| Record on Appeal for USCA5 17-10250 (related to #73 appeal): transmitted to Chaz Rodgers on disk only by hand delivery. (svc) |
| Record on Appeal for USCA5 17-10250 (related to #73 appeal): Record consisting of: ECF electronic record on appeal (eROA) is certified,. PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING: Licensed attorneys must have filed an appearance in the USCA5 case and be registered for electronic filing in the USCA5 to access the paginated eROA in the USCA5 ECF system. (Take these steps immediately if you have not already done so, since the USCA5 briefing deadline has now been set. Once you have filed the notice of appearance and/or USCA5 ECF registration, it may take up to 3 business days for the circuit to notify the district clerk that we may grant you access to the eROA in the USCA5 ECF system.) To access the paginated record, log in to the USCA5 ECF system, and under the Utilities menu, select Electronic Record on Appeal. Pro se litigants may request a copy of the record by #contacting the appeals deputy in advance to arrange delivery. (svc) |
| Filing 75 Transcript Order Form: re #73 Notice of Appeal. Transcript Not Requested by Chaz Z Rodgers (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified event on 3/30/2017 (svc). |
| Filing 74 USCA Case Number 17-10250 for #73 Notice of Appeal filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (svc) |
| Filing 73 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #59 Order on Motion Deny Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #54 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, #69 Order Accepting/Adopting Findings and Recommendations, #70 Judgment, #56 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, to the Fifth Circuit by Chaz Z Rodgers. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. IMPORTANT ACTION REQUIRED: Provide an electronic copy of any exhibit you offered during a hearing or trial that was admitted into evidence to the clerk of the district court within 14 days of the date of this notice. Copies must be transmitted as PDF attachments through ECF by all ECF Users or delivered to the clerk on a CD by all non-ECF Users. See detailed instructions #here. (Exception: This requirement does not apply to a pro se prisoner litigant.) Please note that if original exhibits are in your possession, you must maintain them through final disposition of the case. (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified on 2/28/2017 (svc). |
| Filing 72 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CORRECT CLERICAL ERROR IN JUDGMENT filed by Chaz Z Rodgers (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) CT Corporation Failure to Accept Service of Process, #2 Exhibit(s) Certified Mail Receipts, #3 Exhibit(s) CT Corporation Failure to Accept Filling) (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified title per MJ Chambers on 2/17/2017 (ctf). |
| Filing 71 PARTY'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT filed by Chaz Z Rodgers (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified title per MJ Chambers on 2/17/2017 (ctf). |
|
Filing 70
JUDGMENT: The estate's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice and all of the plaintiff's individual claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 2/2/2017) (epm)
|
|
Filing 69
ORDER ACCEPTING #66 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's individual claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 2/2/2017) (epm)
|
| Filing 68 OBJECTION to #66 Findings and Recommendations objection and proposal by Chaz Z Rodgers (Rodgers, Chaz) |
| Filing 67 Duplicate filing of #66 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United State Magistrate Judge. (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified text on 1/10/2017 (sss). |
|
Filing 66
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION on Case re: #3 Complaint filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. Plaintiff's claims should be dismissed without prejudice and #53 Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively Quash Service and Brief in Support and #55 Motion to Dismiss should be denied as moot. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/6/2017) (epm) Modified docket text 1/9/2017 (ali).
|
| Filing 65 Notice of First Set Request for Production filed by Chaz Z Rodgers with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Memo Req for Production, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement First Set Req for Prod) (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified docket text and terminated motion event on 12/28/2016 (bdb). |
| Filing 64 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chaz Z Rodgers (Rodgers, Chaz) |
| Filing 63 Received letter from USCA5: The Supreme Court denies the petition for a writ of certiorari. (sss) |
| Filing 62 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chaz Z Rodgers Supreme Court docket#16-5486 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of service) (Rodgers, Chaz) |
| Filing 61 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chaz Z Rodgers (Rodgers, Chaz) |
| Filing 60 REPLY filed by Methodist Dallas Hospital re: #57 MOTION For Denial re #54 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, #53 First MOTION to Dismiss or alternatively Quash Service, #55 Second MOTION to Dismiss or alternatively Quash Service, #56 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, (Nason, Christina) |
|
Filing 59
ORDER on plaintiff's #57 Motion to Deny Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Because the plaintiff only seeks denial of the defendant's pending dispositive motion, the pro se filing is liberally construed solely as her response to the defendant's pending dispositive motion. The Clerk of Court shall terminate the pending dispositive motion docketed in conjunction with the plaintiff's response. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/22/2016) (mcrd) (Main Document 59 replaced on 8/23/2016) (mcrd).
|
|
Filing 58
ELECTRONIC ORDER: The courtroom in which this case will be tried, and in which any motion that is set for hearing will be heard, has electronic equipment to assist in the expeditious presentation of the case and making of the record. Descriptions of this equipment and training resources for lawyers are available on the Court's website, http://www.txnd.uscourts.gov/judge-lynns-courtroom. The Court requires that all persons planning to use the equipment schedule training through the Court's Information Technology Department prior to the beginning of any trial or motion hearing, by contacting Paul Hertel at 214-753-2226 or Paul Slavonik at 214-753-2232. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/19/2016) (gmg)
|
| Filing 57 MOTION For Denial re #54 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, #53 First MOTION to Dismiss or alternatively Quash Service, #55 Second MOTION to Dismiss or alternatively Quash Service, #56 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, filed by Chaz Z Rodgers with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 motion deny to motion to dismiss, #2 memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss) (Rodgers, Chaz) |
|
Filing 56
ORDER re: #55 Methodist Hospitals of Dallas' Second Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively Quash Service and Brief in Support. Respondent may file a response by 9/5/2016. Movant may file a reply by 9/19/2016. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/16/2016) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 55 Second MOTION to Dismiss or alternatively Quash Service filed by Methodist Dallas Hospital with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Nason, Christina) |
|
Filing 54
ORDER re: #53 Methodist Hospitals of Dallas' Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively Quash Service and Brief in Support. Respondent may file a response by 8/8/2016. Movant may file a reply by 8/22/2016. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/19/2016) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 53 First MOTION to Dismiss or alternatively Quash Service filed by Methodist Dallas Hospital with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s) Affidavit of Brian Hickman). Party Methodist Hospitals of Dallas added.Attorney Christina G Nason added to party Methodist Dallas Hospital(pty:dft) (Nason, Christina) |
| Filing 52 RESPONSE re: #51 First Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (sss) |
|
Filing 51
First Magistrate Judge's Questionnaire sent to Chaz Z. Rodgers. Deadline to respond to the questionnaire is 21 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/1/2016) (axm)
|
|
Filing 50
ORDER denying #49 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/1/2016) (axm)
|
| Filing 49 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amendment) (twd) |
|
Filing 48
AMENDED ORDER: Rodgers is ORDERED to file a Third Amended Complaint, no later than thirty days from the date of this Order, including allegations that will allow the Court to determine whether Rodgers is Hudson's sole heir, including whether Hudson had any siblings, and whether any such siblings have any descendants. The Third Amended Complaint should be signed under penalty of perjury. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 6/15/2016) (bdb)
|
|
Filing 47
ORDER: Roberts is ORDERED to file a Third Amended Complaint, no later than thirty days from the date of this Order, including allegations that will allow the Court to determine whether Roberts is Hudson's sole heir, including whether Hudson had any siblings, and whether any such siblings have any descendants. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 6/14/2016) (bdb)
|
| Filing 46 JUDGMENT/MANDATE of USCA as to #37 Notice of Appeal filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of this Court. Case remanded to the district court for further proceedings. Issued as Mandate: 5/26/2106. (axm) |
| Filing 45 Opinion of USCA in accordance with USCA judgment re #37 Notice of Appeal, filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. The judgment of dismissal is REVERSED and REMANDED. (axm) |
| Filing 44 CT Corporation System Notification as to #37 Notice of Appeal. (axm) |
|
Filing 43
ORDER of USCA as to #37 Notice of Appeal, filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. Motion for stay pending appeal is denied. (svc)
|
| Filing 42 Received letter from USCA5 regarding motion to supplement record, motion for transcript, and extension of time. (skt) |
| Record on Appeal for USCA5 14-10402 (related to #37 appeal): transmitted to Chaz Z Rodgers on disk only by hand delivery. (axm) |
| Record on Appeal for USCA5 14-10402 (related to #37 appeal): Record consisting of: 2 ECF electronic record, certified to USCA. To request a copy of the record (on disk or on paper), #contact the appeals deputy in advance to arrange delivery. (axm) |
| Filing 41 Received letter from USCA5: The court has granted appellant's motion to reopen the appeal. (svc) |
|
Filing 40
ORDER of USCA as to #37 Notice of Appeal, filed by Chaz Z Rodgers is dismissed for want for prosecution. (svc)
|
| USCA Case Number 14-10402 for #37 Notice of Appeal, filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (svc) |
| Filing 39 Request for Record on Appeal filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (svc) |
| Filing 38 Notice of Correction of Signature Omission, correcting signature omission in #37 Notice of Appeal, filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (ctf) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Fifth Circuit by Chaz Rodgers. T.O. form to appellant electronically at #Transcript Order Form or US Mail as appropriate. Copy of NOA to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Transfer Notice of Appeal to 5th Circuit) (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified on 4/2/2014 to correct filer (svc). |
|
Filing 36
JUDGMENT. It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff's amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Judgment and the Order Accepting the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to Plaintiff. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/13/2014) (ndt)
|
|
Filing 35
Order Accepting #33 Findings and Recommendation of The United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/13/2014) (ndt)
|
| Filing 34 Motion and Notice of Objection and Statement of Jurisdiction filed by M Adams, Michael Adams, David P Bryant, Daniel Bufe, Devon O Candler, Brian Dorsey, Bryan Dorsey, Abi M Finberg-Province, James Grimes, Lancaster Police & Fire Department, Methodist Dallas Hospital, James Skach, Jeremy Stuckey (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified on 3/4/2014 - Filer used incorrect event; document is not a motion, rather objections to #33 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation (mcrd). |
|
Filing 33
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: Plaintiff's complaint should be DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 2/18/2014) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 32 RESPONSE filed by Chaz Rodgers re: #31 Order (Rodgers, Chaz) Modified filer on 8/12/2013 (ctf). |
|
Filing 31
ORDER denying #28 Request for Issuance of Summons. If the Court determines that this case survives judicial screening, it will order service of process at that time without necessity of a motion. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/7/2013) (axm)
|
| Filing 30 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Michael Adams, David P Bryant, Daniel Bufe, Bryan Dorsey, Abi M Finberg-Province, James Grimes, Methodist Dallas Hospital, James Skach, Jeremy Stuckey, Devon O Candler filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (axm) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER re: #25 Motion to Reconsider. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the 7/24/20163 order denying her 7/23/2013 motion for leave to amend her complaint to consolidate it with claims against a new defendant. Because she seeks leave to amend her complaint and has now attached a proposed amended complaint, the plaintiff's motion is liberally construed as a motion for leave to amend her complaint, and as such, it is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file and docket the attachment to the current motion as the plaintiff's second amended complaint. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/7/2013) (axm)
|
| Filing 28 Request for Summons filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (axm) |
|
Filing 27
PARTIAL JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that because the individual pro se plaintiff may not prosecute this complaint on behalf of her son's estate without legal counsel, the estate's claims are dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/30/2013) (cea)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER ACCEPTING #19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Case re: #3 Complaint filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. The claims of the plaintiff's son's estate will be dismissed by separate judgment. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/30/2013) (cea)
|
| Filing 25 MOTION for Reconsideration re #24 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (Attachments: #1 Original of Amended to Consolidate 3:13-CV-02031-M-BH) (tla) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER denying plaintiff's #23 Motions to Amend and Add & "Consolidate 3:13-C-02031-M-BH". (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/23/2013) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 23 MOTION to Amend filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (ctf) |
| Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Daniel Bufe, Lancaster Police & Fire Department, James Skach, Jeremy Stuckey, Michael Adams, James Grimes, Bryan Dorsey filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (axm) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER re: #20 Motion to Amend Finding, Conclusions, and Recommendations Against Lancaster Police Dept et al. The motion for reconsideration and for leave to amend is GRANTED. The portion of the #19 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation relating to the dismissal of the plaintiff's individual claims for failure to prosecute or follow court orders is hereby VACATED. The attachment to the plaintiff's current motion shall be docketed as her amended complaint (not withstanding the title of the filing, which is the same as the current motion). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 7/10/2013) (axm)
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to Amend #19 Findings and Recommendations filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (axm) |
|
Filing 19
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: The individual plaintiff's claims should be dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow court orders, unless she files an amended complaint setting forth only her personal claims against each defendant within the time for objecting to this recommendation, or some other deadline set by the Court. Because the individual plaintiff may not prosecute this complaint on behalf of her son's estate without legal counsel, the estate's claims should be dismissed without prejudice, unless licensed counsel enters an appearance on its behalf within the time for objection to this recommendation, or some other deadline set by the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/24/2013) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER re: #5 Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs; and #17 Amended Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. The applications are hereby GRANTED under 28 U.S.C. 1915, and the individual plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis. The individual plaintiff's third renewed request that she be appointed counsel based on her financial status (see doc. #17 ) is DENIED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/13/2013) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with affidavit in support filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (aaa). Added MOTION to Appoint Counsel on 6/13/2013 (mcrd). |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion To Amendment for Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Cost. The proposed amended application is unsigned and unsupported by an affidavit or otherwise submitted under penalty of perjury, and it therefore may not serve as a basis for granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis at this time. The individual plaintiff may file a properly signed amended application to proceed in forma pauperis within FOURTEEN days from the date of this order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/11/2013) (Attachments: #1 Amended PHV) (cea)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION To Amendment for Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Cost filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (tln) Modified on 6/12/2013 (cea). |
|
Filing 14
ORDER denying #12 Motion for Reconsideration In Forma Pauperis or to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Cost. The individual plaintiff may file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis within FOURTEEN days from the date of this order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/10/2013) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Motion to proceed IFP) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER denying #11 Motion for Reconsideration Appointment of Counsel. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/10/2013) (mcrd)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order, #8 Order And Notice of Deficiency filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (aaa) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Reconsideration re #9 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (aaa) |
|
Filing 10
Order and Notice of Deficiency: must address the following deficiency: must retain legal counsel for this action to proceed on the estates behalf. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 14 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/3/2013) (tla)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER denying #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel: The Motion for the Appointment of Counsel (doc. 6) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/3/2013) (tla)
|
|
Filing 8
Order and Notice of Deficiency: must address the following deficiency: the estate must pay the $400 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 14 days. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/3/2013) (tla)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The individual plaintiff shall pay the required $400.00 filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within FOURTEEN days from the date of this order. If she fails to do so, denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be recommended, and her individual claims will be subject to dismissal without prejudice as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/3/2013) (tla)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8,9,10. Mon Jun 3 09:24:06 CDT 2013 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2. Fri May 31 09:43:42 CDT 2013 (crt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (ykp) Modified on 6/3/2013 to correct spelling of plaintiff's last name (gr). |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. (ykp) Modified on 6/3/2013 to correct spelling of plaintiff's last name (gr). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Chaz Z Rodgers. (ykp) Modified on 6/3/2013 to correct spelling of plaintiff's last name (gr). |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Chaz Z Rodgers. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership (ykp) Modified on 6/3/2013 to correct spelling of plaintiff's last name (gr). |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ykp) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to writ clerk/staff attorney. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ramirez (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter/electronically. No prior sanctions found. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ramirez). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ykp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
