USA v. Thirty-nine (39) firearms and twenty-five thousand and eight assorted rounds of ammunition seized on July 16, 2011
USA |
Thirty-nine (39) firearms and twenty-five thousand and eight assorted rounds of ammunition seized on July 16, 2011 |
3:2013cv02718 |
July 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
David C Godbey |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: USA v. Thirty-nine (39) firearms and twenty-five thousand and eight assorted rounds of ammunition seized on July 16, 2011 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: USA | |
Represented By: | John J de la Garza-DOJ, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Thirty-nine (39) firearms and twenty-five thousand and eight assorted rounds of ammunition seized on July 16, 2011 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.