Murillo Modular Group Ltd v. Sullivan et al
| Murillo Modular Group Ltd |
| Ann Sullivan and Crenshaw Ware & Martin, PLC |
| 3:2013cv03020 |
| August 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Barbara M.G. Lynn |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Plaintiff Murillo Modular Group, Ltd.'s Opposed Motion for Leave to Extend Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 95 ]. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 11/2/2016) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Murillo's Motion to Compel Ann Sullivan to Respond to Deposition Questions [Dkt. No. 69 ] and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Murillo's Motion to Compel Defendants to Comply with Their Discovery Obligations [Dkt. No. 64 ] and Defendants' Motion for Protective Order [Dkt. No. 77 ]. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L Horan on 10/20/2016) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Defendants' 26 Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, GRANTS in part Defendants' 33 Motion for a More Definite Statement, and directs Plaintiff to replead the following allegations on or before 4/21/2015. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/31/2015) (twd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
