Wells v. Bank of America, N.A.

Wells v. Bank of America, N.A.

Plaintiff:	Gary Wells
Defendant:	Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number:	3:2013cv03658
Filed:	September 12, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Barbara M.G. Lynn
Nature of Suit:	All Other Real Property
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 14, 2015	Filing 35 ORDER ACCEPTING 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendant's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. By separate judgment, Plaintiff's remaining claims will be DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/14/2015) (axm)
September 12, 2014	Filing 21 ORDER ACCEPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Motion re: 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Bank of America NA. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support, filed 9/19/2013 (doc. 4 ), is GRANTE D in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claim against Defendant for an accounting is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Remaining for trial are Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, limitation of actions under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.035, quiet title, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/12/2014) (cea)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 14, 2015

Filing 35 ORDER ACCEPTING 34 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendant's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. By separate judgment, Plaintiff's remaining claims will be DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 7/14/2015) (axm)

September 12, 2014

Filing 21 ORDER ACCEPTING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE on Motion re: 4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Bank of America NA. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support, filed 9/19/2013 (doc. 4 ), is GRANTE D in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's claim against Defendant for an accounting is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Remaining for trial are Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, limitation of actions under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.035, quiet title, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/12/2014) (cea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wells v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Wells
Represented By:	Robert Lane Addison
Represented By:	David F Gonzales
Represented By:	Geoff J Henley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By:	Nathan T Anderson
Represented By:	Frank J Catalano
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?