Continental Insurance Company v. Dawson

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Northern District Continental Insurance Company v. Dawson

Continental Insurance Company v. Dawson

Plaintiff:	Continental Insurance Company
Defendant:	David Dawson
Case Number:	3:2013cv04150
Filed:	October 14, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	Barbara M.G. Lynn
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2017	Filing 150 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 75 , 83 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED and the 71 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. If Plaintiff seeks to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, it shall file a motion by 4/24/2017, stating why it is entitled to do so. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/31/2017) (twd)
March 31, 2015	Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES the following Motions filed by Defendant: the 23 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; the 23 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; the 23 Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue. Having converted Defendant's 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim into a Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court GRANTS the Defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's 50 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. As a result of the foregoing, the Court DENIES as moot Defendant's 26 Motion to Transfer Venue. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/31/2015) (twd)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2017

Filing 150 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 75 , 83 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED and the 71 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. If Plaintiff seeks to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, it shall file a motion by 4/24/2017, stating why it is entitled to do so. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/31/2017) (twd)

March 31, 2015

Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES the following Motions filed by Defendant: the 23 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; the 23 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; the 23 Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue. Having converted Defendant's 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim into a Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court GRANTS the Defendant's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's 50 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. As a result of the foregoing, the Court DENIES as moot Defendant's 26 Motion to Transfer Venue. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/31/2015) (twd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Continental Insurance Company v. Dawson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Continental Insurance Company
Represented By:	Robert Paul Boudloche
Represented By:	Loren R Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: David Dawson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?