Allen et al v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. et al
C.W. Allen and S.D. Allen |
Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and Matrix Financial Services Corporation |
3:2013cv04710 |
November 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Sam A Lindsay |
Foreclosure |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons herein explained, the court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiffs' remaining claim under the Texas Debt Collections Practices Act ("TDCPA") based on Defendants' failure to obtain a bond, and dismisses with prejudice this action. Additionally, the court denies Plaintiffs' motion to reconsider the court's dismissal of their previously dismissed claims. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/29/2015) (tln) |
Filing 18 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Denies Plaintiffs' C.W. Allen, et al., First Amended Motion to Remand Based on Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 6 . Denies as moot Defendants Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and Matrix Financial Services Corporation 's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 8 . Grants Defendants Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and Matrix Financial Services Corporation's Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 16 . Plaintiffs shall file a response to the court's sua sponte motion by 8/1/2014. Defendants shall not file a reply unless directed by the court to do so. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/21/2014) (tla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.