United States of America v. Cobos et al
United States of America |
Antonio Ledezma Cobos, Karen Cobos Balderrama, Xochitl Balderrama, Sandra Williams, Francisco Diaz and Guadalupe Zurita Ortega |
3:2013cv04924 |
December 18, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Anderson |
Sam A Lindsay |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 70 Motion for New Trial filed by Antonio Ledezma Cobos. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 4/30/2018) (svc) |
Filing 67 Memorandum Opinion and Order : For the reasons herein stated, the court grants the United States' 63 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court grants the United States' 66 Motion to Dismiss Defendants Francisco Diaz and Guadalupe Zurita Ortega. (please see order for specifics) (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/5/2017) (ndt) |
Filing 30 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying without prejudice 16 MOTION for Default Judgment against Antonio Ledezma Cobos, Antonio Ledezma Cobos; denying without prejudice 24 MOTION for Default Judgment against Karen Cobos Balderrama; denying without prejudice 26 MOTION for Default Judgment against Xochitl Balderrama; granting 28 MOTION for New Trial construed as a Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default. The Cobos Defendants shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by10/30/2015. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/30/2015) (jrr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.