Cunningham v. City of Balch Springs et al
| Michael Cunningham |
| City of Balch Springs, Jonathan Haber, James Young, William Morris and Edward Ortega |
| 3:2014cv00059 |
| January 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
Supplemental Memorandum Opinion and Order: On 3/31/2017, the court issued a memorandum opinion and order in this case denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 61 ). The court issues this supplemental memorandum opinion and order to expound on certain key points. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 4/3/2017) (axm)
|
|
Filing
41
Memorandum Opinion and Order grants in part and denies in part 35 Motion for New Trial filed by Michael Cunningham. Specifically, the court grants the motion with regard to Plaintiffs § 1983 claims against Officers Young and Haber, and denies the motion in all other respects.Discovery due by 3/21/2016. Motions due by 5/2/2016. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/20/2016) (mem)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/19/2015) (aaa)
|
|
Filing
18
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court grants defendant City of Balch Springs' 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and grants defendants Young, Haber & Morris' 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss 7 5 . Plaintiff shall replead his federal claims against the City and the Individual Defendants; shall file his amended pleading by 10/21/14. Failure to replead as ordered will subject this action to dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) or Rule 41(b). The state law claims of intentional infliction of emotional di stress and false imprisonment are dismissed with prejudice against the City and the Individual Defendants. Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages against the City an the Individual Defendants on the federal and state law claims are dismissed with prejudice. The court denies the dismissal of malicious prosecution claim. The court denies as moot the alternative motion for Rule 7a Reply. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 9/30/2014) (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
