Five Ten Texas III LLC v. Soto
Plaintiff: Five Ten Texas III LLC
Defendant: Juan Cesar Soto
Case Number: 3:2014cv00355
Filed: January 29, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Presiding Judge: Irma Carrillo Ramirez
Nature of Suit: Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING 8 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, this action will be sua sponte REMANDED to the Dallas County Court at Law No. 3 by separate judgment. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 3/14/2014) (ctf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Five Ten Texas III LLC v. Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Five Ten Texas III LLC
Represented By: Kevin W Vice
Represented By: Dale H Henley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Juan Cesar Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?