Jones v. Pate Rehabilitation
Plaintiff: Hardy Jones
Defendant: Pate Rehabilitation
Case Number: 3:2014cv02218
Filed: June 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Presiding Judge: Paul D Stickney
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 110 Memorandum Opinion and Order denies 107 MOTION for New Trial or to Alter or Amend the Judgment or grant Judgment as a Matter of Law. For the reasons herein stated, the court concludes that Plaintiff has not set forth sufficient legal or factual bases that would entitle him to a new trial, or that would cause the court to alter or amend the judgment. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 5/5/2017) (ndt)
June 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the court concludes that there is no genuine dispute of material fact as to Plaintiff's Title VII sex discrimination and retaliation claims, and his ADEA retaliation claim; conclude s that Pate is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on these claims; and concludes that there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to Plaintiff's ADEA age discrimination claim. Accordingly, the court grants Defendant Pate Rehabilitatio n Endeavors Inc's 45 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff's Title VII sex discrimination and retaliation claims, and ADEA retaliation claim, and dismisses them with prejudice. The court denies Defendant Pate Rehabilita tion Endeavors, Inc.'s 45 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff's ADEA age discrimination claim. The age discrimination claim remains for trial, and an amended scheduling order will be entered by separate document. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 6/17/2016) (twd)
July 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order Accepting 4 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court therefore denies Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In District Court Without Paying Fees or Costs (Doc. 1-1) and directs Plaintiff to pay the requisite statutory filing fee by 7/18/2014. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 7/7/2014) (skt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Pate Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hardy Jones
Represented By: Ugalahi Agbo Claire Offoboche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pate Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?