Stark v. Holder et al
| Bradley Christopher Stark |
| Christopher Stokes, Paul L Yanowitch, Sarah R Saldana, James T Jacks, Richard B. Roper, Eric H Holder, Jr, Laura Schlier, Ronald Loecker and Timothy Neylan |
| 3:2014cv02920 |
| August 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights |
| 9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER ACCEPTING 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, all of Plaintiff's claims against Eric Holder, Richard Roper, James Jacks, Sarah Sald ana, Paul Lee Yanowitch, and Christopher Stokes should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(2) and 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(e)(2)(B (iii); all of Plaintiff's claims against the United States of America should be DISMISSE D WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (B)(I) and (ii); and all of Plaintiff's claims against Laura Schlier, Ronald Loecker, and Timothy Neylan, and alternatively, all of Plaintiff's claims against defendants Holder, Roper, Jacks, Saldana, Yanowitch, and Stokes, should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to their being asserted again until the Heck v. Humphrey conditions are met, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (B)(I) and (ii). (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 10/7/2014) (ctf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
