De La Cruz v. Graber et al
| Armando Garcia De La Cruz |
| John Doe, Katie N Freeman, Carlos Mier, Amy C Mayberry Hollis, Yselda T Yanez, Tom F Goforth, Maureen Cruz, Eddy M Mejia, NFN Jaffe, Ronda Hunter, J Capps and A Duckworth |
| 3:2014cv03846 |
| October 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Paul D Stickney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER: After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the 46 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 2/24/2016) (bdb)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 28 MOTION to Amend 28 USC §1331 Pleadings filed by Armando Garcia De La Cruz; granting 29 MOTION to Amend 28 U.S.C. Section 1331 Pleadings filed by Armando Garcia De La Cruz; denying as moot 30 MOTI ON to Request Status of Case filed by Armando Garcia De La Cruz; adopting 31 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; and denying 32 MOTION for reconsideration. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/24/2015) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
