MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. The Chillicothe Telephone Company et al
Plaintiff: MCI Communications Services, Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc.
Defendant: The Chillicothe Telephone Company, The Minford Telephone Company, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC, Windstream Ohio, Inc. and XO Ohio, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2015cv01052
Filed: April 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Sidney A Fitzwater
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1131
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. The Chillicothe Telephone Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MCI Communications Services, Inc.
Represented By: Tamerlin J Godley
Represented By: Margaret G Maraschino
Represented By: Martha Brewer Motley
Represented By: Henry Weissmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Verizon Select Services Inc.
Represented By: Tamerlin J Godley
Represented By: Margaret G Maraschino
Represented By: Martha Brewer Motley
Represented By: Henry Weissmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Chillicothe Telephone Company
Represented By: J Philip Calabrese
Represented By: Elizabeth L Moyo
Represented By: Mark Stephen Stemm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Minford Telephone Company
Represented By: William A Adams
Represented By: J Philip Calabrese
Represented By: Sabrina C. Haurin
Represented By: Elizabeth L Moyo
Represented By: Mark Stephen Stemm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company LLC
Represented By: Douglas Edward Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Windstream Ohio, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XO Ohio, Inc.
Represented By: Adam Caldwell
Represented By: Micah J Ratner
Represented By: Christopher Savage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?