Hill v. Dallas County District Attorney's Office et al
| T H Hill |
| Dallas County District Attorney's Office, Dallas County, City of Dallas, Brenda H Thompson, Carl E Roberts LLC, Carl R King and Dallas County Clerks Office |
| 3:2015cv01311 |
| April 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 10 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by T H Hill. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 7/23/2015) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; adopting 12 Report and Recommendations re Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. (Ordered by Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 6/3/2015) (Judge Sidney A Fitzwater)
|
|
Filing
12
Recommendation Regarding Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal. The request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be DENIED because the Court should certify pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that the appeal is not taken in good faith. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/2/2015) (mcrd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
