Briggs & Morgan PA v. Manley Toys Limited
| Briggs & Morgan PA |
| Manley Toys Limited |
| Michaels Stores Inc |
| Toy Quest Ltd |
| 3:2015cv01446 |
| May 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| A. Joe Fish |
| Paul D Stickney |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Application for a Writ of Garnishment |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER ACCEPTING 69 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is therefore ORDERED that garnishee Michaels Stores, Inc.'s motion for reasonable attorneys fees (docket entry 64 ) is GRANTED in part. It is further ORDERED that Toy Quest, Ltd. pay garnishee Michaels Stores, Inc.'s reasonable attorney's fees in the amount of $39,095.50. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 5/25/2016) (ran)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The garnishee's 59 motion to alter or amend judgment is DENIED. The garnishee's motion to alter or amend judgment is converted into a motion for attorney's fees and, so converted, the motion for attorney's fees is GRANTED. The garnishee is directed to file and serve a motion for reasonable attorney's fees, supported by the affidavit of counsel, within fourteen days of this date. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/3/2015) (axm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
