Ream v. Global Power Equipment Group Inc et al
| Daniel Ream |
| Global Power Equipment Group Inc, Luis Manuel Ramirez, Raymond K. Guba and Terence J. Cryan |
| 3:2015cv01679 |
| May 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Barbara M.G. Lynn |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
AMENDED MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION: Defendants' 103 Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs conceded at the hearing that they do not have new factual allegations to supplement the TAC. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/26/2018) (sss)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION granting 103 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Class Action Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 9/11/2018) (axm)
|
|
Filing
99
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 81 Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint. The Court grants Plaintiffs leave to amend to attempt to address the defects identified in this Order by filing an amended complaint on or before 1/15/2018. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 12/27/2017) (ams)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
