Redus v. CSPH Inc
Plaintiff: John Michael Redus
Defendant: CSPH Inc
Case Number: 3:2015cv02364
Filed: July 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Barbara M.G. Lynn
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of 2/28/2017, Order [Dkt. No. 53 ] and Defendant CSPH, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Evidence in Support of its Motion for Protective Orde r [Dkt. No. 57 ]; VACATES the Court's 2/28/2017 Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order [Dkt. No. 50 ]; DENIES Defendant CSPH, Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order [Dkt. No. 32 ]; and ORDERS that, considering all of the circumstances here and the Court's ruling above, the parties will bear their own expenses, including attorneys' fees. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 5/15/2017) (sss)
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court therefore need not reach the other issues raised by the MPO and will GRANT in part and DENY in part CSPH's Motion for Protective Order [Dkt. No. 32 ] and ORDER consistent with the limitation s set by the Court's First Phase of Scheduling Order Regarding Bifurcated Discovery [Dkt. No. 12 ], as later amended,see Dkt. No. 14 ; Dkt. No. 19 that Plaintiff John Michael Redus and his counsel will not, without further court authorizat ion, communicate with potential class members to investigate or otherwise obtain discovery on the merits on Redus's claims or on the issue of whether this case is appropriate for litigation as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standard s Act, until the Court rules on his Motion for Conditional Certification. And, considering all of the circumstances here and the Court's ruling above, the parties will bear their own expenses, including attorneys' fees, in connection with CSPH's Motion for Protective Order [Dkt. No. 32 ]. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/28/2017) (mcrd)
February 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court therefore need not reach the other issues raised by the MPO and will GRANT in part and DENY in part CSPH's Motion for Protective Order [Dkt. No. 32 ] and ORDER consistent with the limitations set by th e Court's First Phase of Scheduling Order Regarding Bifurcated Discovery [Dkt. No. 12 ], as later amended, see Dkt. No. 14 ; Dkt. No. 19 that Plaintiff John Michael Redus and his counsel will not, without further court authorization, comm unicate with potential class members to investigate or otherwise obtain discovery on the merits on Redus's claims or on the issue of whether this case is appropriate for litigation as a collection action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, until the Court rules on his Motion for Conditional Certification. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/24/2017) (mcrd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redus v. CSPH Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Michael Redus
Represented By: J Derek Braziel
Represented By: Jesse Hamilton Forester
Represented By: Michelle Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CSPH Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?