Dyer et al v. City of Mesquite Texas et al
| Kathy Dyer and Robert Dyer |
| City of Mesquite Texas, Jack Fyall, Richard Houston, Alan Gafford, Zachary Scott, William Heidelburg, Paul Polish, Joe Baker and Bill Hedgpeth |
| 3:2015cv02638 |
| August 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS the officers' motion for summary judgment on that claim. As to the Dyers' excessive-force claim, the Court DENIES the officer's motion for summary judgment on the Dyers' claim against Officer Gafford and GRANTS the motion on the Dyers' claims against the other officers. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 6/6/2018) (ykp)
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS the Paramedic Defendants' portion of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 49 ) and DISMISSES all of the claims against them with prejudice. With regard to the Officer Defendants, the Court DEFERS RULING o n their portion of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 49 ) as to the excessive force claims, denial of medical care claims, and their corresponding assertions of qualified immunity as to those claims, pending limited discovery and later reconsideratio n on summary judgment. The Court GRANTS Officer Defendants' portion of the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 49 ) with regard to the Dyers' claim for interference with a parent-child relationship. Lastly, the Court GRANTS Mesquite's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 47 ) in its entirety and DISMISSES all of the Plaintiffs' claims against Mesquite with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 1/12/2017) (axm)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS (1) the City of Mesquite's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24 ); (2) the 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss By Defendants Fyall, Houston, Gafford, Scott, Polish and Baker (Doc. 26 ); and (3) the 12(b)(6 ) Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Hedgpeth and Heidelberg (Doc. 31 ), and ORDERS that the Dyers' claims be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Limited Discovery (Doc. 38 ), but GRANTS them leave to amend their Complaint on or before 5/18/2016. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 5/3/2016) (bdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
