White et al v. Sierra Auto Financing LLC et al
Marteen Reed White and Gregory White |
Sierra Auto Financing LLC and Central Autohaus & Roberts Group |
3:2015cv02822 |
August 31, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Jane J Boyle |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER ACCEPTING 39 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC's Rule 12(b)(5) Motion to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process is GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Central Autohaus & Roberts Group shall participate in arbitration with the Whites. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 6/13/2016) (bdb) |
Filing 38 ORDER ACCEPTING 36 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC's Rule 12(b)(5) Motion to Dismiss (doc. 7 ) for Insufficient Service of Proces s is DENIED as moot. Further, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC's Motion for the Court's Abstention and Dismissal (doc. 18 ) is DENIED as moot. Finally, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Auto Finance, LLC's Supplemental Motion for the Court's Abstention and Dismissal (doc. 29 ) is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 5/2/2016) (ran) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.