Farrow v. CitiMortgage Inc
Douglas Farrow |
CitiMortgage Inc |
3:2015cv03813 |
November 25, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Rockwall |
Sam A Lindsay |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The court denies Plaintiffs Application for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 1 - 2 ). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 1/25/2016) (mem) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Farrow v. CitiMortgage Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Douglas Farrow | |
Represented By: | Kerry L Prisock |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CitiMortgage Inc | |
Represented By: | Lauren Elizabeth Hayes |
Represented By: | Walter McInnis |
Represented By: | C Charles Townsend |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.