Le v. Exeter Finance Corp et al
Plaintiff: Binh Hoa Le
Defendant: Exeter Finance Corp and Enzo Parent LLC
Case Number: 3:2015cv03839
Filed: December 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 2
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 104 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's remaining quantum meruit claim. (Ordered by Judge Sam A. Lindsay on 3/9/2020) (chmb)
March 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court determines that no genuine dispute of material fact exists as to any of the elements of Plaintiff's claims on which Defendants moved for summary judgment, except for his quantum meruit claim. The court, th erefore, denies Defendants' 27 Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff's quantum meruit claim, grants the motion in all other respects, and dismisses with prejudice all claims asserted by Plaintiff in this action, except for his quantum meruit claim. The court also grants Defendants' 28 Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Plaintiff's Expert; overrules as moot, except to the extent specifically addressed and ruled upon in this opinion, Plaintiff's 31 Objection to Defendants' Summary Judgment Evidence and Motion to Strike; denies Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Continuance; overrules as moot, except to the extent specifically addressed and ruled upon in this opinion, Defendants 39 Objecti ons to Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Evidence; grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's 57 Motion for Clarification on Discovery Deadline, or in the Alternative, Motion for Extension of the Same; denies as moot Plaintiff's 63 M otion to De-Designate "Highly Confidential" Documents in Defendants' Productions; denies as moot Plaintiff's Second 83 Motion to Compel; and denies as moot Plaintiff's 86 Motion to Set Trial Date and Enter Scheduling Orde r. Accordingly, any response by Plaintiff to this order and sua sponte motion by the court shall be filed by 4/14/2019, and any reply by Defendants shall be filed by 4/28/2019. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 3/31/2019) (chmb) Modified to correct filing date on 4/1/2019 (cea).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Le v. Exeter Finance Corp et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Binh Hoa Le
Represented By: Levi G McCathern, II
Represented By: Matthew Steven Muckleroy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exeter Finance Corp
Represented By: Gregory M Clift
Represented By: R Rogge Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enzo Parent LLC
Represented By: Gregory M Clift
Represented By: R Rogge Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?