Edmond v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Northern District Edmond v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing Inc

Edmond v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing Inc

Plaintiff:	Lakeshia R Edmond
Defendant:	Fair Collections & Outsourcing Inc
Case Number:	3:2015cv03857
Filed:	December 3, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Barbara M.G. Lynn
Presiding Judge:	Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 6, 2016	Filing 32 ORDER ACCEPTING 30 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 26 MOTION to Reopen Case: The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were fi led. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 6/6/2016) (bdb)
March 31, 2016	Filing 24 Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge re: 23 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 13 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Lakeshia R Edmond, 21 Motion to Transfer Case Out of District/Division filed by Lakeshia R Edmond, 20 Motion to Dismiss filed by Fair Collections & Outsourcing. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/31/2016) (ndt)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 6, 2016

Filing 32 ORDER ACCEPTING 30 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 26 MOTION to Reopen Case: The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were fi led. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 6/6/2016) (bdb)

March 31, 2016

Filing 24 Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge re: 23 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 13 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Lakeshia R Edmond, 21 Motion to Transfer Case Out of District/Division filed by Lakeshia R Edmond, 20 Motion to Dismiss filed by Fair Collections & Outsourcing. (Ordered by Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 3/31/2016) (ndt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edmond v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakeshia R Edmond
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Fair Collections & Outsourcing Inc
Represented By:	Tori S Levine
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?