Wilder v. Ogden Ragland Mortgage et al
| Bryan W Wilder |
| Ogden Ragland Mortgage, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Caliber Home Loans Inc, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Connie J. Vandergriff |
| 3:2015cv04013 |
| December 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| David C Godbey |
| Paul D Stickney |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER ACCEPTING 64 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No. 55 ] is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 1/16/2018) (sss)
|
|
Filing
53
Order Accepting 50 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation: The 25 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and 35 Motion to Strike is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 3/17/2017) (epm)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER ACCEPTING 42 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The objections are overruled. IT IS ORDERED that Caliber Home Loans Inc and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation a/k/a Freddie Mac's 5 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Bryan W. Wilder's 11 Motion to Strike Defendants' Motion and Defenses is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/22/2016) (twd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
