Inge et al v. Walker et al
| Peyton Inge |
| Walter Walker, Ted Phillips, John Orchard, Steven McNamara, James Dugger, Ty Howard, Eric Falt, Central Motorcycle Roadracing Association, Nancy Selleck, Bill Syfan and Tom Anderson |
| 3:2016cv00042 |
| January 7, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Doc. 103 . The Court DISMISSES with prejudice Inges ultra vires claim, his defamation claim in part, his breach-of-contract claim, and his conspiracy claim. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 10/26/2017) (ams)
|
|
Filing
78
Memorandum Opinion and Order Denied 20 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Peyton Inge. For the reasons stated above, the Court concludes that it may not remand the entire case, has supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims, and will continue to exercise such supplemental jurisdiction. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Request for Attorneys' Fees. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 9/15/2016) (ndt)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER denying 24 Motion to Disqualify Opposing Counsel. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 4/25/2016) (ran)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
