Steele v. Partington et al
| Tommy W Steele |
| Abe Partington and Waxahachie Police Department |
| 3:2016cv00360 |
| February 9, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Paul D Stickney |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
Order Accepting 42 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/4/2018) (zkc)
|
Filing
23
ORDER: The 21 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Clerk's Office is directed to reopen this case; Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Abe Partington shall proceed and process shall be issued as to this Defendant at the Waxahachie Police Department; Plaintiff's claims against the Waxahachie Police Department are dismissed; A copy of this order shall be mailed to the Ellis County District Attorney's Office; The Clerk of the Court shall return this case to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/14/2017) (sss)
|
Filing
10
Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 9 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 2 Complaint. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 6/7/2016) (mem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.