Certian Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Lowen Valley View LLC et al
| Certian Underwriters at Lloyd's London |
| Lowen Valley View LLC and Panade II Ltd |
| Panade II Ltd and Lowen Valley View LLC |
| Certian Underwriters at Lloyd's London |
| 3:2016cv00465 |
| February 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London. The Court also GRANTS summary judgment sua sponte in favor Underwriters on its request for declaratory relief and DE NIES sua sponte Defendants' request for declaratory relief. Because this order is dispositive of the case, Underwriters's Objections to Defendants' Expert Witness Disclosure (Doc. 58 ) is OVERRULED as moot at this time. Additionally, the parties' Joint Motion for Status Conference (Doc. 90 ) is also DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/21/2017) (aaa)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Defendants' Opposed Motion to Compel Production of Certain Documents Withheld from Production [Dkt. No. 62 ]. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/9/2017) (mcrd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
