Youtoo Technologies LLC v. Twitter Inc
| Youtoo Technologies LLC |
| Twitter Inc |
| 3:2016cv00764 |
| March 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| David C Godbey |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
323
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 260 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 7/22/2024) (cfk)
|
|
Filing
258
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: This Order addresses the construction of several disputed claim terms pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (en banc), aff'd, 517 U.S. 370 (1996). Plaintiff VidStream, LLC ("VidStream") contends that Defendant Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") infringes two United States Patents.1 Having reviewed the relevant intrinsic evidence in the record, and such extrinsic evidence as necessary, the Court construes the disputed terms and phrases as provided below. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 12/18/2023) (oyh)
|
|
Filing
199
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court d enies Twitter's motion to dismiss. The parties are directed to conferand report back to the Court in writing fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order regarding the status of this case and where it fits procedurally in the Miscellaneous Order 62 framework. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 4/1/2022) (ndt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
