Denman v. USA

Denman v. USA

Petitioner:	Jeffrey Denman
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	3:2016cv01188
Filed:	May 2, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office:	Dallas Office
County:	Dallas
Presiding Judge:	A. Joe Fish
Presiding Judge:	Renee Harris Toliver
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 1, 2017	Filing 17 ORDER ACCEPTING 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The 13 motion for reconsideration under FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) is CONSTRUED as a successive motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and that it i s TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to OPEN and CLOSE, for administrative purposes, a new civil action based on the finding that the Rule 60(b) motion is a successive application. Civil case 3:17-cv-1144-G opened. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 5/1/2017) (axm)
July 11, 2016	Filing 5 ORDER ACCEPTING 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is therefore ORDERED that the motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is summarily DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by the one-year statute of limitations. Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Sections 2254 and 2255 Proceedings in the United States District Court, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the court DENIES a certificate of appealability. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/11/2016) (bdb)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 1, 2017

Filing 17 ORDER ACCEPTING 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The 13 motion for reconsideration under FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) is CONSTRUED as a successive motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and that it i s TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to OPEN and CLOSE, for administrative purposes, a new civil action based on the finding that the Rule 60(b) motion is a successive application. Civil case 3:17-cv-1144-G opened. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 5/1/2017) (axm)

July 11, 2016

Filing 5 ORDER ACCEPTING 3 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is therefore ORDERED that the motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is summarily DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by the one-year statute of limitations. Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Sections 2254 and 2255 Proceedings in the United States District Court, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the court DENIES a certificate of appealability. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/11/2016) (bdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denman v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffrey Denman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?