Busch v. CPS et al
Phil Busch |
CPS, Mario Greco, T D Jakes, Pat Robertson, Donald Trump, Tekiema Taylor, Jesicia McClinton, Natosha Hooks, Adalyn Seftas and Mellannise Henderson Love |
3:2016cv01378 |
May 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Dallas Office |
Dallas |
Sam A Lindsay |
Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Order Accepting 20 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/6/2016) (ykp) |
Filing 10 ORDER: On 6/23/2016, it was recommended that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for want of prosecution because the plaintiff had failed to file a notice of change of address, and an order of the Court had been returned as und eliverable as a result. (See doc. 8 .) Later that day, the plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. (See doc. 9 .) Accordingly, the 6/23/2016 findings, conclusions, and recommendation for dismissal are hereby VACATED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/24/2016) (mcrd) |
Filing 8 ***Vacated per 10 Order*** Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation: This case should be dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute or follow orders of the court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 6/23/2016) (mcrd) Modified on 6/24/2016 (mcrd). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.