Tyler v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, et al
| Lou Tyler |
| Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC and Deutshe Bank |
| 3:2016cv01698 |
| June 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Anderson |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Paul D Stickney |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: After carefully reviewing the motion, record, and applicable law, the court denies Plaintiff's 12 Motion for Reconsideration; and denies as moot Plaintiff's 13 Motion to Produce the Note. Considerin g the record in this case, the court certifies that the appeal of this action is not taken in good faith and withdraws Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. 24(a)(3). In support of this certificati on, the court accepts and incorporates by reference the Report and the court's order accepting the Report. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the foregoing orders, the court concludes that the appeal of this action presents no legal point of arguable merit and is, therefore, frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/26/2016) (twd)
|
|
Filing
9
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 8 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Complaint, filed by Lou Tyler. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 8/16/2016) (mem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
