Advanced Physicians SC v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company et al
| Advanced Physicians SC |
| Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, Cigna Healthcare Management Inc, Great West Healthcare Cigna, MultiPlan Inc, National Care Network LLC and Data Isight |
| 3:2016cv02355 |
| August 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| A. Joe Fish |
| Insurance |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
247
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Cigna's 218 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, Advanced's 220 motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and Cigna's 235 motion to strike is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as moot. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/8/2021) (mla)
|
|
Filing
130
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Denying 110 Motion to Compel filed by Advanced Physicians SC. While Plan beneficiaries assigned their claims for reimbursement under the Plan to Advanced, Advanced is not a "beneficiary" for the purpose of asserting the fiduciary exception to the attorney-client privilege under ERISA. Specifically, the Court finds that the assignment does not assign to Advanced the beneficiaries'right to assert the attorney-client privilege or sue for breach of fiduciary duty. (see order) (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 4/17/2019) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 84 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 3/27/2018) (ran)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The defendants' motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Although the court denies the Rule 12(b)(1) portion of the defendants' motion, it grants the Rule 12(b)(6) portion of the defendants' motion to dismiss as to claims (1), (2), and (4). Accordingly, claims (1), (2), and (4) of AP's Third Amended Complaint are DISMISSED without prejudice. AP shall have leave to amend its complaint to cure the pleading defects described above -- if it can -- provided that AP's amended complaint is filed and served no later than 11/7/2017. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/27/2017) (sss)
|
|
Filing
33
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 18 Motion to Remand to State Court. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 12/8/2016) (epm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
