United States of America v. 0.2853 Acres of Land et al
| United States of America |
| 0.2853 Acres of Land, CB Tittle Ltd and AR1 Land Ltd |
| 3:2016cv02814 |
| October 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Land Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1358 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS the United States' Motion for Limited Relief from the Stay [Dkt. No. 112 ]. The parties are instructed to submit a proposed schedule by July 23, 2020, outlining the deadlines related to the limited relief from the stay. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 6/26/2020) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER ACCEPTING 101 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court hereby denies Defendants' 96 Motion to Sever the United States' Amendment to the Complaint with Declaration of Taking. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 10/7/2019) (mla)
|
|
Filing
69
Order Accepting 65 Findings and Recommendations. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to terminate the 34 Motion for Legal Determination on Before Condition of Subject Property and the 66 MOTION to Modify in Part and Clarify in Part the Report and Recommendation. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 8/28/2018) (epm) (Corrected Order 69 replaced on 8/28/2018) (lrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
