Rutila v. United States Department of Transportation et al
| Harold Edward Rutila, IV |
| United States Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration |
| 3:2016cv02911 |
| October 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Jane J Boyle |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 112 ) for all five FOIA requests: FOIA 803, 862, 1174, 9149, and 9151. (Ordered by Judge Jane J Boyle on 6/30/2022) (ndt)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED and the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 80 , is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/20/2020) (ctf)
|
|
Filing
73
Order Accepting 70 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, Doc. 39 , and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Doc. 51 , are GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/13/2019) (zkc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
