Zamarripa v. Farrakhan et al
| Enrique Zamarripa |
| Louis Farrakhan, Nation of Islam, Al Sharpton, National Action Network, Black Lives Matter, Rashad Turner, Opal Tometi, Patrisse Cullors, Alicia Garza, Deray McKesson, Johnetta Elzie, New Black Panthers Party, Malik Zulu Shabazz and George Soros |
| 3:2016cv03109 |
| November 7, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Anderson |
| Barbara M.G. Lynn |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
Order Accepting 113 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 106 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, 100 Motion to Set Aside Default, 89 Motion for Default Judgment. The Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Against Defe ndant Deray McKesson, 89 , is DENIED, the Motion to Set Aside Default and to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 100 , is GRANTED, and Opal Tometi and Patrisse Cullors' Special Appearance to Challenge Service of Process and Personal Jurisdictio n 106 , is DENIED as moot. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's claims against Deray McKesson will be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and his claims against the remaining defendants will be sua sponte DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 3/4/2019) (epm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.