Elliott v. The United States of America et al
Plaintiff: Michael Elliott
Defendant: The United States of America, The Department of Justice, Loretta Lynch and Harley G Lappin
Case Number: 3:2016cv03231
Filed: November 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Jane J Boyle
Presiding Judge: Paul D Stickney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Michael Elliotts 55 Traverse, which the Court construes as a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 4/15/2019) (svc)
February 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 53 Order Accepting 51 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Defendant Tammy Sherman's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issues of Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies and Qualified Immunity (ECF No. 45 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are DISMISSED with prejudice. Additionally, Defendant's request for attorneys' fees is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 2/25/2019) (zkc)
July 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Order Accepting 15 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of theUnited States Magistrate Judge. It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims that Defendants Sgt. Greg Nottingham and Lt. Sherman failed to protect him shall proceed and process shall be issued as to these Defendants, the United States Marshal Service shall serve process on Defendants at the Hunt County Jail. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 7/17/2017) (ykp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elliott v. The United States of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Loretta Lynch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harley G Lappin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?