Whaley v. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas et al
| Michael Dewayne Whaley |
| Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Texas Department of Pardons & Paroles, Judge of 282nd Judicial District Court, Brook A Busbee and Honorable Criminal District Attorney |
| 3:2016cv03281 |
| November 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Irma Carrillo Ramirez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
Order Accepting 39 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 38 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Michael Dewayne Whaley. The post-judgment motion (doc. 38) is construed as a motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate the motion in No. 3:16-CV-3281-C and docket it in No. 3:18-CV-144-C. The Rule 60(b) motion is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 4/10/2018) (epm)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ACCEPTING 32 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate the motion in this civil rights case; (2) open a new habeas case for administrative purposes only; (3) docket the mo tion in that new case as a§ 2254 petition filed 1/11/2018; (4) directly assign the new case to the same District Judge and Magistrate Judge as in this case; (5) file in the new case a copy of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of t he United States Magistrate Judge, this order accepting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, and a copy of the Fifth Circuit's sanctions order in No. 11-10180; and (6) ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the new case for failure to comply with the sanctions order. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/19/2018) (ykp)
|
|
Filing
32
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation re: the plaintiff's post-judgment 31 Motion for Released [sic] on Parole. Based on the relevant filings and applicable law, the filing should be construed as a new habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, opened as a new case, and administratively closed. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 1/17/2018) (mcrd)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER ACCEPTING 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The post-judgment motion (doc. 27 ) is construed as a motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/19/2017) (axm)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ACCEPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The plaintiff's Motion for Personal Recognition Bond, received on 8/3/2017 (doc. 13 ), is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/5/2017) (sss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
