Stancu v. Hyatt Corporation/Hyatt Regency Dallas
Plaintiff: John Stancu
Defendant: Hyatt Corporation/Hyatt Regency Dallas
Case Number: 3:2017cv00675
Filed: March 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: David L. Horan
Presiding Judge: Sam A Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 119 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Defendant Hyatt Corporation's fee application [Dkt. Nos. 96 & 97] and ORDERS Plaintiff Johns Stancu to pay Hyatt its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in opposing his motion to compel Hyatt's responses to certain of his requests to produce documents under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34 [Dkt. Nos. 70, 71, 75, 76, & 77] in the amount of $3,535.30. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 10/18/2018) (zkc)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 110 Order Accepting 106 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation 3 Complaint, filed by John Stancu, 82 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Hyatt Corporation/Hyatt Regency Dallas. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 9/18/2018) (ndt)
February 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 81 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff's 70 Motion to Compel. The Court will grant Plaintiff John Stancu until March 7, 2018 to file a response explaining why the Court should not enter an order requiring him to pay Defendant Hyatt C orporation, as required by Rule 37(a)(5)(B), the expenses, including attorneys' fees, that Hyatt incurred in drafting and filing its Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 79]. Hyatt may file a reply in support of an award of expenses under Rule 37(a)(5)(B) by March 21, 2018. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 2/14/2018) (zkc)
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS the motion for protective order 18 and enters this order, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(A), forbidding the disclosure to Plaintiff John Stancu of information in the EEOC's files of other charging parties who have brought claims against Hyatt. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/13/2017) (ash)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stancu v. Hyatt Corporation/Hyatt Regency Dallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Stancu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyatt Corporation/Hyatt Regency Dallas
Represented By: John V Jansonius
Represented By: David Robert Schlottman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?