Moore v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Tincy R. Moore
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2017cv00913
Filed: March 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Office: Dallas Office
County: Rockwall
Presiding Judge: David L. Horan
Presiding Judge: Barbara M.G. Lynn
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2019 Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for An Award of Attorney Fees under 406(b) of the Social Security Act [Dkt. No. 23 ] and awards counsel $10,647.38 in attorneys fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 11/1/2019) (mcrd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tincy R. Moore
Represented By: Karl E Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?