White Glove Staffing Inc et al v. Methodist Hospitals of Dallas et al
| White Glove Staffing Inc and Carolyn Clay |
| Methodist Hospitals of Dallas and Dallas Methodist Hospitals Foundation Inc |
| 3:2017cv01158 |
| May 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Dallas |
| Ed Kinkeade |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 52 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court GRANTS the Motion as to White Glove's § 1981 retaliation claim. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 10/23/2018) (rekc)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 52 ) (the "Motion"). The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the Motion. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/19/2018) (sss)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 42 Motion for Class Certification. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 5/29/2018) (zkc)
|
|
Filing
27
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Claims in Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint and Brief in Support. The Court dismisses Plaintiff White Glove's Title VII discrimination and retaliation claims, Texas Commission on Human Rights Act discrimination and retaliation claims, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 discrimination claim. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 9/7/2017) (ash)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
