Berghorn v. Xerox Corporation et al
| Kyle Scott Berghorn |
| Xerox Corporation and Texas Workforce Commission |
| 3:2017cv01345 |
| May 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Austin |
| Sam A Lindsay |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 5/23/2019) (rekc)
|
|
Filing
35
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 18 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 7/3/2018) (axm)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part, denying in part 4 Motion for Partial Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(4). The court severs and remands Plaintiff's state law claim under TUCA against the Texas Workfor ce Commission ("TWC") to the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, from which it was removed. As a result of the severance and remand of Plaintiff's state law claims and the court's dismissal of Plaintiff's federal Title VII claim based on sexual orientation, only Plaintiff's federal Title VII claim against Xerox for gender or sex stereotyping remains in this court. The court directs the clerk of the court to amend the caption of this case to Kyle Berghorn v. Xerox Corporation. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 11/15/2017) (aaa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
