Dawes v. City of Dallas et al
| Mary Dawes, Alfredo Saucedo and Virgilio Rosales |
| City of Dallas, Christopher Hess and Jason Kimpel |
| 3:2017cv01424 |
| May 30, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Dallas Office |
| Anderson |
| Sidney A Fitzwater |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
Memorandum Opinion and Order: As a result, the Court once again GRANTS the City of Dallas's motion for summary judgment. A final judgment will follow. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 8/21/2025) (ndt)
|
|
Filing
155
Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court DISMISSES AS MOOT the plaintiffs' 144 Motion for Certificate of Appealability and GRANTS the City of Dallas's 147 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 9/6/2022) (ykp)
|
|
Filing
142
Memorandum Opinion and Order re: 136 accepted (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 8/11/2022) (frw)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER ACCEPTING THE 117 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court hereby ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's findings, conclusions and recommendation and DENIES the City's motion to dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 3/30/2021) (ykp)
|
|
Filing
90
Order Accepting 88 Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court therefore GRANTS defendant City of Dallas's motion to dismiss plaintiffs Mary Dawes, Alfredo Saucedo, and Virgilio Rosales's (collectively, "plaint iffs") state law claims against defendant Christopher Hess [Doc. No. 14 ]. The Court further GRANTS plaintiffs' request to replead [Doc. No. 21] solely with regards to their failure to train claim against City of Dallas. Plaintiffs must file their amended complaint within 14 days of the issuance of this order. Lastly, the Court hereby administratively closes this case. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 7/28/2020) (axm)
|
|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court therefore ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Reports 71 , 72 as the findings and conclusions of the Court except as they relate to the City of Dallas's motion to dismiss the claim against itself. The Cou rt REJECTS the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge's Reports 71 as they relate to the City of Dallas's motion to dismiss the claim against itself. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the City of Dallas's 13 motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claim against itself and DISMISSES this claim WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court GRANTS IN PART the City of Dallas's 14 motion to dismiss the state law claims against officers Kimpel and Hess. The Court GRANTS this motion as ap plied to officer Kimpel and DISMISSES the state law claims against officer Kimpel WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. However, the Court does not rule at this time on this motion as applied to officer Hess. Lastly, the Court DENIES Kimpel's 35 motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims as to himself and his alternative request to require the plaintiffs to file a reply to his sovereign immunity defense. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 7/2/2020) (mla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
